September 2, 2008
the net is abuzz with the latest google move: google chrome. people are trying to figure out why ? what ? how ?
i type this post from chrome, and i see: a combo of ie8 and firefox3. to go. with bits of safari and opera all thrown in. even this review is just thrown together from initial impressions.
disclaimer: i firmly believe that firefox 3 is the best browser around.
back to the show.
we have speed dial. we have the ‘omnibar’. we have privacy. we have cool animations when you move tabs out of windows, for urls on pages, previews, search etc. we have download managers. we have auto-bookmarking. we have combined features from 3 different browsers which attempt to integrate together. and they do, somewhat decently.
however, i don’t like the philosophy.
- tabs are actually seperate windows all grouped together. so chrome now has 5 entries in my windows task manager:
1 for each site i open i don’t know what they are all for. does this mean that chrome has better memory management? for the 0.2 release, chrome is currently using 71 mb, when i have 2 tabs open.
- there is a ‘chrome’ task manager with detailed stats. this looks neat and informative - still not relating to my windows task manager though. the download manager looks neat too, with details and a nice hour clock progress bar.
- there’s no google integration. i was hoping to see a sign-in screen for google. chrome is google, therefore the interface should magically interface with google. 2 tiny mentions of google: statistics reporting, and gears. i don’t see options login to my bookmarks, reader, gmail. the point ? launching a ‘google’ browser - it should have been launched with complete google integration. wasn’t that the point of this browser ? i would have switched. or at least been more enthusiastic.
- i now have a GoogleUpdate.exe sitting in the systray. why ?
- i can’t set the web-page speed dial. it depends on my browsing history. thats a little silly. what if i watch a lot of pr0n ?
- google search via omnibar, no seperate area. this takes a lot of getting used to.
- i’m not checking for compatibility. i read that ajax (is supposedly better implemented) and flash are fine. i’m assuming most things will be broken while google or others run around setting up functionalities.
finally, the main reason i even opened this page to write: is it necessary ?
we have 3-4 browsers out there in common use, of which i would rate fx3 as being right on top. ie plays catch-up, and opera is not compatible enough to be judged. i have heard good things of safari, but i don’t like apple+i don’t like sneaky installs. google is a big player in fx, with many fx defaults remaining google-centric. then why the browser ? to herald the start of the operating system within a browser ? to herald web applications finally becoming desktop based ? what of google gears ? wouldn’t it have made more sense to release a bunch of google plugins to deliver this functionality to firefox ? or were there so many plugins that they just added a wrapper and made a new browser ? i foresee a lot of these features, neat as they are, coming to fx, and maybe even ie. i would not have expected google to stoop to microsoft-levels and attempt to take over the internet. they already own the web to a large extent, keeping themselves divorced from OS and that huge ditch would have been a nice way to ensure they remain ubiquitous. how long before chrome becomes a requirement to use google rather than an option ? chrome-centric features are bound to debut soon. ‘you can do a,b,c but if you want to find the nth root of pi, use google chrome!’.
i wonder, i wonder. is this the beginning or the end of google ?
« Hide Post
March 10, 2008
based on the release notes for the latest beta of firefox, all i can say is: wow. i’m blown away, and then some. how something like IE8 even hopes to compete, i don’t know. safari is always a boo-hoo, and opera, i’m sorry to say can’t really measure up in terms of compatibility.
the question will soon be: how did people browse the net before firefox ?
meanwhile, i skirt dangerously on the border of killing myself for the next deadline. however, i know that this is the reason i’m doing any of this in the first place. i’m loving every minute of it.
July 19, 2006
after reading a very interesting article about the myths surrounding firefox, i was curious enought to try out opera 9. supposedly having everything FF “claims to have” and much more… even if the site-author uses avant… and given that i’m unable to work on any other but my own firefox installation currently, its a real test to see if opera does it for me.
so far, i’m impressed by the sleekness of the package. some neat intuitive features, simple options… and i thought i might just replace FF. the wand feature has to be ultra-cool, as is tab preview.
but.
rendering issues. major. its happening right now on this web-page with the width of the text barely understanding its own text box. the page fonts look different to me too, which doesn’t seem right. FF couldn’t be completely changing the look of pages in wordpress ! opera has problems with google too.. and that shows on their homepage, gmail, and even reader.
the big thing i’m missing is the simpler adblock and the tab-mix-plus… i’m a little spoiled
it may just be a matter of me getting used to it, or discovering whether i’ve screwed up some setting to cause such variation to what i see in firefox… so i’m going to give it a coupla days. but i can see why opera never appealed to me - not when i saw it as supposedly “the fastest browser on the web” a few years ago.. or on prasanna’s laptop.
and these #$@%$%@# keyboard shortcuts, have caused me to retype this 4 times. @#@!#@#$$#@%$R@#$@#$…
update: can’t handle wordpress correctly, back to FF for now.. will try to use tomorrow, for general webbing. no support for yahoo mail beta. its like opera is being kept out of the market.
final take ? i can’t live without adblock now. ads I didn’t know existed are showing up.. me no like. plus the google factor. unfortunate, because opera has all the features and more that anyone could ask for. FF does not even come close in that sense. but extensions take it away. FF is the browser for the future. at least for now.
in other tid-bits, i’m in love with google notepad, and there are quite a few ways for indian bloggers to circumvent the ban.
July 16, 2006
we all probably know of the release of FF2 beta 1, if not; here’s a quick round-up of the features; with a lengthier review as well.
in short, a lot of the “features” touted in FF2 are currently possible in FF 1.5.[whatever] using extensions. namely the tab-mix-plus and google toolbar extensions. google suggest: check. spell-check: check. undo close-tab: check. feed-reader subscribe: check.
i can do all of these - and even more - if i use the above extensions.
so, then.. what exactly am i gaining by going to FF2 ? lets face it, when i switched to FF0.8 in 2004 from the original mozilla suite, i went to the best browser around. simply because of the innovation, the fresh new look, the speed. IE6 sucks even today, and IE7 only mariginally improves on it by taking the best of FF’s features and implementing them with some memory management. it’s still nothing compared to the extensibility of FF, and hence i’ve not switched back. FF1.5 was a good improvement, and today i cannot imagine life without all my extensions.
some of the memory leak problem that has dogged FF since its launch is now apparently handled a little better. i’m not complaining. integrating extensions into the basic browser will help that - i’m still not complaining.
but where is the innovation ? where is the FF that caused us geeks to stand up and take notice of the “fastest browser on the web” ? the one that made us realise the travesty that was IE6 ? face it, this is the browser that is the reason microsoft had to rewrite IE, cause opera to become free.. and so much more.
and its next major release involves integration of popular extensions into its existing framework. thats it.
i’m not happy. at all. i’ll upgrade when the time comes due to security, and the memory management and so on, but the FF that “rediscovered the web” seems to be dead.
July 1, 2006
have heard a lot about ‘reveal‘, and have finally installed it.. and its good. very very neat. and slick. looks useful, provided i remember to use it.:)
and of course, a solution to windows update. looks good to me, and very useful for the shady people out there
have also shifted back to google home page, though apparently netvibes is the “in thing” now. typical.
December 2, 2005
the latest firefox installed and all ready to go.. my view : this browser is proving to be a better choice every day. its been a long journey from phoenix to the latest version; free software just might have something going for it 